Introduction

A Brandenburg UFO report usually gets solved by rebuilding the sighting as a real-world event: exact time, viewing place, direction, height above the horizon, duration, weather, nearby flight activity, satellite passes, bright planets and the behaviour of the camera that recorded it. That process matters because many reports from Brandenburg begin as honest “I do not know what I saw” observations, not as extraordinary claims. The state’s mixture of dark rural skies, Berlin Brandenburg Airport, military and infrastructure sites, and heavy modern satellite traffic makes careful identification more useful than dramatic speculation. The main lesson from German civilian UFO investigators is straightforward: most cases become less mysterious when the missing context is restored. CENAP, a long-running German UFO reporting centre, has repeatedly linked recent report surges to Starlink satellites, bright planets such as Venus and Jupiter, stars such as Sirius, drones, balloons, aircraft, meteors and camera artefacts rather than exotic craft. GEP’s published UFO/UAP case data also shows why investigators need structured fields such as date, time, place, report form, witness description, classification and investigation result before a sighting can be judged responsibly.[ZDFheute+2hessenschau.de]zdfheute.deufo sichtungen rekord cenap forschungsgruppe 100Rekord an UFO-Sichtungen: 2024 mehr als 1.000…10 Jan 2025 — Starlink-Satelliten sorgen. Konstellation leuchtstarker Planeten w…

The first question is not “alien or not?” but “what was visible there?”

For Brandenburg sightings, the most important step is often the least glamorous one: pinning down the observation. Investigators need the date, clock time, location, direction of view, duration, movement, colour, sound, apparent size, and whether the witness saw the object with the naked eye before filming it. A vague report such as “a line of lights over Rathenow last night” is hard to test. A report saying “seen from the western edge of Rathenow at 21:17, moving from north-west to south-east for four minutes” can be checked against satellites, aircraft, astronomy and weather.

This is especially important in Brandenburg because the sky is not equally familiar everywhere. Westhavelland is promoted as a star park and dark-sky area where the Milky Way can be seen clearly; DarkSky International describes the reserve as covering about 750 square kilometres, and the regional nature park highlights the unusually dark night sky west of Berlin. That makes the area excellent for astronomy, but it also means visitors may suddenly notice satellites, meteors, aircraft lights and bright planets that urban light pollution normally hides.[DarkSky International+2westhavelland-naturpark.de]darksky.orgDark Sky International WesthavellandDarkSky InternationalWesthavellandJanuary 20, 2015 — 20 Jan 2015 — The Dark Sky Reserve consists of a mix of 750 square kilometers of pub…Published: January 20, 2015

The Rathenow and Westhavelland example is a useful local anchor. In 2021, Märkische Oderzeitung reported on unusual sky observations in the area and cited CENAP’s figure of 47 UFO reports from Brandenburg in 2020. The significance is not that Westhavelland is a confirmed “hotspot” for extraordinary craft; it is that a dark rural sky near populated areas produces more striking, reportable observations.[Moz]moz.deUfo über Brandenburg?: Unbekannte FlugobjekteUfo über Brandenburg?: Unbekannte Flugobjekte

A good first-stage reconstruction therefore asks:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--step-flow" markdown="1">

1. Was the time exact or estimated? A difference of ten minutes can decide whether a satellite train, aircraft approach or meteor match is convincing.
2. Was the direction known? “Over Brandenburg” is too broad; “low in the west from Nauen” can be tested.
3. Did it move with the stars, across the sky, or relative to foreground objects? Stationary lights often turn out to be planets, stars, aircraft on approach, distant towers or camera reflections.
4. Was there a photo or video, and was the object seen before filming? Some “objects” exist only in the image.</div>

   Timing and location checks separate clusters from coincidences

When several people report a light on the same evening, investigators try to find out whether they saw the same thing or different ordinary events. Brandenburg makes this tricky because a bright object can be visible across a wide area, while aircraft and drones may be highly local. A satellite train may cross the whole state in minutes; a drone near BER may matter intensely to air safety but be invisible to observers 20 kilometres away.

CENAP’s recent national figures show why timing is central. In 2024, German-language reporting on CENAP described a record year in which 1,084 reports from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were largely traced to Starlink satellites, bright planets, stars, balloons, drones, aircraft, helicopters, event lights and meteors. In 2025, reports rose again to 1,348, with CENAP again pointing to planets, meteors, satellites, rocket stages, space debris and drones as common causes.[DIE WELT]welt.deDIE WELTImmer mehr Deutsche glauben, Ufos zu sehenDIE WELTImmer mehr Deutsche glauben, Ufos zu sehen

For Brandenburg, a timing check usually works in layers. Investigators first ask whether there was a known sky event at that minute: a Starlink pass, a meteor shower peak, a rocket-body re-entry, or a bright planet low on the horizon. They then ask whether local aviation explains it: scheduled aircraft using Berlin Brandenburg Airport, helicopters, police operations, air-ambulance flights, military activity, or small aircraft. Finally, they consider local ground-based causes such as event lights, illuminated balloons, reflections in windows, or drones.

The difference between a cluster and a coincidence matters. Ten reports from different towns at the same minute, all describing a moving chain of lights, are stronger evidence for a shared cause such as satellites. Ten reports spread across several evenings, each with different directions and descriptions, may simply reflect a period of public attention after media coverage. This is one reason investigators are cautious about calling a “flap” before the reports are normalised by date, time and place.

Astronomy and aviation matches do most of the work

The most common solved Brandenburg sightings are not solved by secret records. They are solved by ordinary cross-checking. If a witness saw a bright “hovering” light low in the evening sky, Venus or Jupiter may be the first comparison. If the light twinkled, changed colour, and stayed in roughly the same place, a bright star such as Sirius can be plausible. CENAP explicitly identified bright planets and stars as major sources of German reports in recent years.[ZDFheute]zdfheute.deufo sichtungen rekord cenap forschungsgruppe 100Rekord an UFO-Sichtungen: 2024 mehr als 1.000…10 Jan 2025 — Starlink-Satelliten sorgen. Konstellation leuchtstarker Planeten w…

Starlink has changed the identification process more than almost any other modern object. Newly launched Starlink satellites can appear as a neat “string of pearls”, while individual satellites can flare when sunlight reflects towards an observer. Research on Starlink misidentification has shown that pilots and lay observers can mistake recently launched satellite trains for UAP, and that reconstruction using orbital elements and flight-position data can resolve otherwise puzzling reports. A separate study of Starlink flares found that specular reflections can make satellites extremely bright under the right geometry.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.

Aviation checks are just as important around BER. Brandenburg reports near the airport need to be treated differently from rural star-park observations because the risk context changes. Aircraft on approach can seem to hang motionless when flying towards the observer. Landing lights can look unusually bright. A helicopter can hover or circle. A drone, even if ordinary, can become a safety incident if it enters controlled airspace.

What's That In The Sky? How To Identify That Flash of Light You Just Saw

Channel: The Weather Network

Open on YouTube

Drones create a new category of Brandenburg sighting

Older UFO discussions often focused on lights in the sky. Modern Brandenburg reports increasingly have to separate skywatching cases from drone-security cases. A drone near a garden, railway, industrial site, military area or airport may be hard for a witness to identify, but the investigation route is different: police logs, restricted airspace, operator tracing, air-traffic disruption, and counter-drone powers become more relevant than astronomy.

Regional reporting in 2025 said Brandenburg had recorded 84 sightings of drones of unknown origin that year, with many over military facilities and others over BER and industrial sites. The same reporting noted that the state was looking to improve legal powers for drone defence because illegal drone activity can interfere with air traffic and threaten critical infrastructure.[DIE WELT]welt.deDIE WELTMinisterium: 84 Drohnen-Sichtungen in BrandenburgDas Innenministerium betont die zunehmende Bedeutung der Abwehr illegaler Drohnen. Ob es sich bei den Vorfällen um Spionage handelt, ist…

That does not mean every suspicious light near a sensitive site is a hostile drone. Investigators still have to rule out aircraft, helicopters, hobby drones, balloons, stars, and misread lights. But it does mean Brandenburg’s “UFO” record now contains a practical security layer. A report may remain unresolved because the drone was not recovered, the operator was not found, or the observation was brief. That is different from saying the object behaved impossibly.

A useful distinction is:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--insight-grid" markdown="1">

• Classic unidentified sky report: a witness cannot identify a light, shape or movement.
• Identified astronomy or aviation report: the timing and direction match a planet, satellite, aircraft, meteor or similar source.
• Unresolved drone/security report: authorities treat the sighting as a possible unmanned aircraft but lack enough evidence to identify the operator, model or purpose.
• Weak report: the description is too vague, late, second-hand or unsupported to classify confidently.</div>

This distinction helps readers avoid two common mistakes: dismissing every unresolved report as nonsense, or treating every unresolved report as evidence of something extraordinary.

Photo and camera pitfalls can create objects that were never in the sky

Modern Brandenburg sightings often arrive with phone footage. That helps investigators, but it also creates traps. A camera does not simply record the sky; it interprets light through a lens, sensor, software processing and stabilisation. A bright lamp, the Moon, Venus, an aircraft landing light or a reflection in a window can produce secondary dots, streaks or “orbs” that look separate from the original source.

CENAP and wider reporting on German UFO cases have repeatedly pointed to photos and videos with strange light points that turn out to be optical effects, insects, birds, balloons or ordinary objects. WELT’s 2025 report on CENAP noted examples such as lens reflections, blurred insects and birds among reported images, while AARO’s public case material shows the same general problem in a more official setting: objects in video can be assessed as balloons or birds when shape, motion and environmental context are analysed together.[DIE WELT]welt.deDIE WELTImmer mehr Deutsche glauben, Ufos zu sehenDIE WELTImmer mehr Deutsche glauben, Ufos zu sehen

The most common photo checks are practical. Investigators look for a bright source just outside the frame, repeated shapes that mirror the position of a lamp or planet, motion that follows camera shake rather than the sky, and objects that appear only after zooming. They also ask for the original file rather than a compressed social-media copy, because metadata, exposure time and frame sequence can be lost.

Lens flare deserves special attention. Technical imaging literature describes flare spots as artefacts caused when a strong light source enters or sits near the camera’s field of view, producing internal reflections that are not part of the real scene. For UFO work, that means a glowing dot in a Brandenburg night-sky photo is not automatically a flying object; it may be an optical by-product of the Moon, a streetlamp, car headlights or a bright planet.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Automatic Flare Spot Artifact Detection and Removal in PhotographsarXiv Automatic Flare Spot Artifact Detection and Removal in Photographs

What makes a Brandenburg case stronger or weaker?

A strong Brandenburg report is not one that sounds dramatic. It is one that gives investigators enough independent information to test. A short, precise account from several separated witnesses can be more useful than a long, excited story with no time, direction or original media.

The strongest reports tend to have:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--example" markdown="1">

• Exact timing: ideally to the minute, not “late evening”.
• A fixed observing point: town, street area or coordinates without exposing private details.
• Direction and elevation: for example, “low in the south-west” rather than “above the house”.
• Duration and movement: whether it crossed the sky, hovered, flashed, descended or faded.
• Original media: unedited photo or video, with metadata preserved where possible.
• Independent witnesses: especially from different locations.
• Negative as well as positive checks: what was ruled out, not only what was noticed.</div>

Weak reports usually lack the very information needed to solve them. A cropped video of a dot, uploaded days later, with no direction or exact time, may be impossible to identify even if the original cause was ordinary. That kind of case should be labelled “insufficient information”, not promoted as a deep mystery.

Beginner's Guide To Ufology, UFO Studies, UFOs, UAP

Channel: Ben Lovegrove

Open on YouTube

How solved, unresolved and debunked cases should be reported

A careful Brandenburg UFO page should not flatten every outcome into “explained” or “unexplained”. Investigators need more precise language. A sighting can be identified when the time, direction and behaviour match a known object well. It can be probably identified when the match is strong but not complete. It can be unresolved when the data is good enough to test but no explanation fits. It can be unclassifiable when the report is too thin. It can be debunked when a claimed extraordinary interpretation conflicts with clear evidence.

GEP’s open dataset is valuable because it treats case handling as structured investigation rather than storytelling. Its records include sighting date and time, sighting location, report form, free-text statements, classifications and investigation results, with personal data removed. That is the kind of structure Brandenburg cases need if they are to be compared across years instead of recycled as isolated anecdotes.[Zenodo]zenodo.orgUFO / UAP Falldaten 1972–202324 Jan 2024 — Die Falldaten der Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens (GEP) e.V. enthalten It…

This also protects witnesses. Many people report a UFO because they saw something genuinely puzzling, not because they are making a grand claim. A respectful investigation can say, “This was almost certainly Starlink,” or “This was probably Venus,” without mocking the observer. In dark-sky parts of Brandenburg, an unfamiliar but ordinary sky can be genuinely startling.

The best public wording is therefore modest: “unidentified at the time”, “later matched to”, “likely explained by”, “insufficient detail to classify”, or “remains unresolved on the available evidence”. Those phrases are less exciting than “mystery craft”, but they are more honest and more useful.

Heute ist Welt-UFO-Tag | maintower

Channel: Hessischer Rundfunk

Open on YouTube

Why Brandenburg’s identification process matters

Brandenburg’s UFO history is not built around one famous unsolved incident. Its value lies in the way ordinary and security-relevant sightings overlap: Westhavelland stargazing, Starlink trains, bright planets, meteors, airport approaches, police helicopter searches, drones near BER, and reports from residents who simply want to know what they saw.

That makes the identification process the centre of the story. In Brandenburg, a UFO report is best understood as a question to be worked through, not a conclusion to be defended. The same report can pass through several stages: puzzling light, timed observation, astronomy check, aviation check, image review, and final classification. Sometimes the answer is mundane. Sometimes the evidence is too thin. Occasionally, a case may remain unresolved because the data is good but no ordinary match is secure.

For readers, the practical takeaway is simple: the more precise the original report, the less room there is for myth to fill the gaps. In a state with dark skies, a major airport and growing drone concerns, careful identification is not a sceptical afterthought. It is the method that turns Brandenburg sightings from rumours into usable public history.<section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude aria-labelledby="further-reading-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">Amazon book picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="further-reading-title">Further Reading</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Books and field guides related to How a UFO Report Gets Solved. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.</p></div><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The UFO Experience</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Joseph Allen Hynek</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Covers systematic methods for evaluating UFO reports.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">UFOs</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Leslie Kean</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Shows how better evidence distinguishes stronger from weaker cases.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Demon-Haunted World</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Carl Sagan</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Encourages evidence-based investigation and skepticism.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card">Book<div class="fr-book-info"><h4 class="fr-book-title">The Believing Brain</h4><p class="fr-book-author">By Michael Shermer</p><p class="fr-book-desc">Explains perception, bias and mistaken identification.</p><div class="fr-book-actions"> See on Amazon</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"><div class="fr-browse-links" aria-label="Browse more on Amazon">Browse more on Amazon:The UFO ExperienceUFOsThe Demon Haunted World</div><p class="fr-disclosure">As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.</p></div></div></section><section class="further-reading-section" data-page-toc-exclude data-ebay-localized-links data-ebay-visual-market="EBAY_GB" aria-labelledby="merchant-block-title"><div class="fr-section-shell"><div class="fr-section-header"><div class="fr-section-heading"><p class="fr-section-kicker">eBay marketplace picks</p><h3 class="fr-heading" id="merchant-block-title">Marketplace Samples</h3></div><p class="fr-intro">Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.</p><div class="fr-ebay-market-toolbar">Shop location<div class="fr-ebay-market-picker">UsingUSAUSAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland<div class="fr-ebay-market-menu" data-ebay-market-menu role="listbox" hidden></div></div></div></div><div class="fr-ebay-market-panel" data-ebay-market-panel="EBAY_GB" data-ebay-market-default="1"><div class="fr-books-grid"><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">122CM LARGE ROSWELL ALIEN GREEN FINISH UFO EXTRATERRESTRIAL FIGURINE OUTER SPACE</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Bob Lazar UFO / UAP Model - S4 Sports Model -UFO Collectible - Project Gravitaur</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Bob Lazar Inspired UFO Model S4/Area 51 - Retro / Sci Fi + FREE DISPLAY STAND</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article><article class="fr-book-card"><div class="fr-book-info"><p class="fr-book-kicker">Example eBay listing</p><h4 class="fr-book-title">Bob Lazar UFO Model | S4 Sports Model Cutaway | Sci-Fi Display Collectible</h4>SearcheBay.co.uk: UFO collectible<div class="fr-book-actions"> Browse similar oneBay.co.uk</div></div></article></div><div class="fr-section-footer"> Browse more oneBay.co.uk<p class="fr-disclosure">Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.</p></div></div></div></section>

Endnotes

1. Source: zdfheute.de
Title: ufo sichtungen rekord cenap forschungsgruppe 100
Link:https://www.zdfheute.de/panorama/ufo-sichtungen-rekord-cenap-forschungsgruppe-100.html

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Rekord an UFO-Sichtungen: 2024 mehr als 1.000…10 Jan 2025 — Starlink-Satelliten sorgen. Konstellation leuchtstarker Planeten w…</p>

2. Source: hessenschau.de
Link:https://www.hessenschau.de/panorama/wegen-starlink-und-drohnen-rekordzahl-an-ufo-sichtungen-in-deutschland-eingeschickt-v1%2Cufo-sichtungen-100.html

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>land, Österreich und der Schweiz. "Üblicherweise verzeichnet man…</p>

3. Source: zenodo.org
Link:https://zenodo.org/records/10547073

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>UFO / UAP Falldaten 1972–202324 Jan 2024 — Die Falldaten der Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens (GEP) e.V. enthalten It…</p>

4. Source: darksky.org
Title: Dark Sky International Westhavelland
Link:https://darksky.org/places/westhavelland-dark-sky-reserve/

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>DarkSky InternationalWesthavellandJanuary 20, 2015 — 20 Jan 2015 — The Dark Sky Reserve consists of a mix of 750 square kilometers of pub…</p>

Published: January 20, 2015

5. Source: westhavelland-naturpark.de
Title: Westhavelland Nature Park
Link:https://www.westhavelland-naturpark.de/en/

6. Source: moz.de
Title: Ufo über Brandenburg?: Unbekannte Flugobjekte
Link:https://www.moz.de/lokales/rathenow/ufo-ueber-brandenburg_-unbekannte-flugobjekte-leonard-ist-naechster-kandidat-61196141.html

7. Source: welt.de
Title: DIE WELTImmer mehr Deutsche glauben, Ufos zu sehen
Link:https://www.welt.de/255086178

8. Source: welt.de
Link:https://www.welt.de/article695becd2fb77630dac278675

9. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08155

10. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Extreme Flaring of Starlink Satellites
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13091

11. Source: welt.de
Title: DIE WELTMinisterium: 84 Drohnen-Sichtungen in Brandenburg
Link:https://www.welt.de/regionales/berlin/article68dfc31d35088eeb70a29e3f/ministerium-84-drohnen-sichtungen-in-brandenburg.html

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Das Innenministerium betont die zunehmende Bedeutung der Abwehr illegaler Drohnen. Ob es sich bei den Vorfällen um Spionage handelt, ist…</p>

12. Source: welt.de
Link:https://www.welt.de/regionales/berlin/article6978e9d675382e2302905730/brandenburg-will-drohnenabwehr-im-polizeigesetz-verbessern.html

13. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

14. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Automatic Flare Spot Artifact Detection and Removal in Photographs
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.04384

15. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Toward Flare-Free Images: A Survey
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14354

16. Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

17. Source: nasa.gov
Title: to release discuss unidentified anomalous phenomena report
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/

18. Source: zenodo.org
Link:https://zenodo.org/records/13923653

19. Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

20. Source: nasa.gov
Title: announces unidentified aerial phenomena study team members
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/

21. Source: zenodo.org
Link:https://zenodo.org/records/15882235

22. Source: zenodo.org
Link:https://zenodo.org/records/10579210

23. Source: zenodo.org
Link:https://zenodo.org/records/20137882

24. Source: zenodo.org
Link:https://zenodo.org/records/14949908

25. Source: hessenschau.de
Link:https://www.hessenschau.de/panorama/deutsche-ufo-meldestelle-verzeichnet-neuen-rekord-von-sichtungen-v1%2Cufo-meldestelle-104.html

26. Source: westhavelland-naturpark.de
Link:https://www.westhavelland-naturpark.de/

27. Source: space.com
Title: nasa ufo uap study team first results revealed
Link:https://www.space.com/nasa-ufo-uap-study-team-first-results-revealed

28. Source: apnews.com
Title: AP News A drone sighting temporarily suspends air travel at the Berlin airport
Link:https://apnews.com/article/233028211d399bbbbbca72a08a767ef3

29. Source: explore.openaire.eu
Link:https://explore.openaire.eu/search/result?pid=10.5281%2Fzenodo.10547073

30. Source: euroufo.net
Link:https://www.euroufo.net/tag/germany/

Additional References

31. Source: youtube.com
Title: What’s That In The Sky? How To Identify That Flash of Light You Just Saw
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDWSgtf23N8

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Lights seen in the Arizona sky aren't aliens, they're 'Starlink' satellites…</p>

32. Source: youtube.com
Title: How to see a UFO. how to identify a UFO, and what to do when you spot a UFO
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEps8YHWsY8

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>Beginner's Guide To Ufology, UFO Studies, UFOs, UAP…</p>

33. Source: youtube.com
Title: Beginner’s Guide To Ufology, UFO Studies, UFOs, UAP
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7WW1WTUVGk

<summary>Source snippet</summary><p>What's That In The Sky? How To Identify That Flash of Light You Just Saw…</p>

34. Source: war.gov
Title: department of defense releases the annual report on unidentified anomalous phen
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3964824/department-of-defense-releases-the-annual-report-on-unidentified-anomalous-phen/

35. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/hindustantimes/videos/watch-flights-at-berlin-brandenburg-airport-were-halted-for-nearly-two-hours-aft/1204628678175226/

36. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380530617_UAP_Research_in_Germany_Single_Case_Studies_Data_Management_Understanding_of_Strangeness

37. Source: merkur.de
Link:https://www.merkur.de/wissen/jupiter-starlink-astronomie-ufo-meldestelle-807-meldungen-himmel-objekte-stern-planet-venus-zr-92756211.html

38. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1qcjvs5/a_global_first_passive_radar_confirms_ufo/

39. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/inquirerdotnet/posts/berlin-airport-briefly-suspends-operations-over-drone-sighting/1366908958953389/

40. Source: policycommons.net
Link:https://policycommons.net/artifacts/21877852/cenap-report-no-244-undefined/22778040/