When Berlin UFOs Appear in Photos

Introduction

Many modern Berlin UFO reports begin not with a dramatic sighting in the sky, but with a second look at a phone photo. Someone photographs the Moon, the television tower, clouds, the sunrise, Potsdamer Platz or a lit building near Alexanderplatz, then notices a dot, disc, triangle or “object” that was not seen at the time. In Berlin’s public case record, these photo-first reports are not a side issue: they are one of the clearest patterns in the city’s recent UFO history. The strongest lesson is cautious rather than sensational. Berlin’s investigated case list includes repeated examples where the odd shape was later assessed as a lens reflection, aircraft, or another ordinary image effect, not as a confirmed unknown object. Ufokarte, using GEP case data, lists 158 documented Berlin cases and says the most recent recorded observation is from 2024; the Berlin state page shows no currently unresolved cases at state level.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deUF O-Sichtungen in Berlin (Berlin) — Ufokarte.deUF O-Sichtungen in Berlin (Berlin) — Ufokarte.de

Why photo-first UFOs matter in Berlin

Berlin is an unusually good setting for accidental UFO photographs. The city is dense, bright and highly photographed. People take casual pictures of landmarks, station architecture, street scenes, the Moon, fireworks, sunsets, lit façades and cloud banks. In those conditions, a camera can record artefacts that look detached from the scene: green dots, pale discs, duplicated lamps, soft ovals, short streaks, or small shapes near bright sources.

That changes the nature of the witness claim. In a traditional sighting, the question is usually, “What did the witness see?” In a phone-photo case, the question is often, “What did the camera produce?” The witness may be entirely sincere while still having no live visual observation to corroborate the object. This is why Berlin’s photo cases belong in the state’s UFO history: they show how modern reporting has shifted from live skywatching to image review, social sharing and later interpretation.

The Berlin case list repeatedly uses phrases equivalent to “noticed later” or “discovered when reviewing the images”. Examples include clouds photographed against the Sun in June 2024, the Moon photographed in Marzahn in September 2022, a coloured building part near the ALEXA shopping centre in November 2021, the Berlin television tower in June 2021, the sunrise in Lichtenberg in January 2019, architecture at Potsdamer Platz in March 2018, city photos near the television tower in November 2017, a long exposure of the Victory Column in December 2015, and an image near the Sun in March 2014. In all of those named entries, the GEP assessment reproduced by Ufokarte identifies the case, most often as lens reflection.[Ufokarte.de+8Ufokarte.de+8Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deberlin 20240616 bberlin 20240616 b

Objects noticed after the fact

The most important feature of these Berlin cases is not the shape. It is the timing. A photograph that reveals an object only after the event has a built-in evidential weakness: there may be no memory of direction, speed, sound, duration, distance, weather, surrounding traffic, nearby birds, aircraft, lights or reflective surfaces. The image can be intriguing, but the surrounding context is often thin.

That does not make the report worthless. It can still be investigated if the original file exists, the time and location are reliable, the camera direction is known, and the object appears consistently across multiple frames. But it does mean the case should be treated differently from a witnessed event with independent observers and a clear chronology.

The June 2024 Berlin case is a useful recent example. The witness submitted three photos of cloud structures taken against the Sun. Only later did she notice two green points and a silver sphere. GEP’s likely explanation was lens reflection. This is a classic photo-first pattern: strong light, later discovery, small coloured objects, and no separate live observation of the supposed object.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deberlin 20240616 bberlin 20240616 b

A similar structure appears in the January 2019 Lichtenberg case, where the witness photographed the rising Sun and later noticed a bright green triangle. GEP again listed lens reflection as the likely explanation. The shape sounds more unusual than a simple dot, but the setting is exactly where optical reflections are expected: a bright light source entering the camera system.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deOpen source on ufokarte.de.

This is why the phrase “the camera caught something I did not see” should raise caution, not ridicule. The witness is reporting a real image feature. The question is whether the feature was a real object in the sky, a reflection within the lens system, a processing artefact, a nearby object out of focus, or a missing-context item such as a bird, balloon, aircraft or insect.

Moon, cloud and tower image cases

Berlin’s accidental photo cases often cluster around visually attractive subjects. That matters because people point their phones at exactly the conditions most likely to generate optical effects: bright lights, strong contrast, night scenes, reflective architecture and backlit clouds.

The September 2022 Marzahn case involved a photograph of the Moon. The witness later noticed a light that seemed to jump between street lamps. GEP’s likely explanation was lens reflection. Moon photos are especially good at producing confusion because the Moon is bright, the surrounding sky is dark, and nearby lamps or building lights can add extra reflections in the lens.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deOpen source on ufokarte.de.

The June 2021 television tower case shows the same mechanism in a landmark setting. The witness photographed the Berlin television tower and later noticed an unusual object in the images. Ufokarte records the GEP assessment as lens reflection. The tower matters here not because it attracts extraordinary objects, but because it attracts cameras: it is a bright, vertical, familiar reference point that people often photograph at night or in contrasty city light.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deberlin 20210619 eberlin 20210619 e

Another television tower-adjacent case came in November 2017, when a witness submitted two phone photos of the city. On later inspection she saw a bright object apparently hovering near the tower. GEP’s likely explanation was again lens reflection. The important detail is “apparently”: in a flat image, a reflection can seem to sit beside or above a landmark even when it was never in the sky at that position.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deOpen source on ufokarte.de.

Berlin’s architecture cases make the same point. In March 2018, a witness photographed architecture at Potsdamer Platz early in the morning and later noticed two arrow-shaped objects and a ring-shaped object in the sky. The case was assessed as lens reflection. On Christmas Eve 2015, a long exposure of the Victory Column showed two disc-shaped objects noticed only afterwards; this too was assessed as lens reflection. These examples are valuable because they show that “disc” or “ring” shapes can arise in ordinary photography, especially when long exposure, city lighting and reflective lens geometry are involved.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deOpen source on ufokarte.de.

Camera artefacts and missing context

The technical explanation behind many of these reports is not obscure. Lens flare occurs when strong light scatters or reflects inside a lens system before reaching the imaging sensor. In phone cameras, it often appears as green or orange dots, or as a ghost image related to a bright light elsewhere in the frame. An Apple Community user guide explains that these effects can occur in all lens systems and are commonly linked to bright sources; Apple’s own Motion guide also describes lens flares as bright-source reflections through multiple lens elements.[Apple Support Community]discussions.apple.comSupport Communityi Phone Camera Lens Flare and ReflectionsSupport Communityi Phone Camera Lens Flare and Reflections

That description fits many Berlin photo reports closely. A bright Moon, sunrise, Sunlit clouds, illuminated buildings, station architecture, street lamps and landmark lighting can all provide the strong source. The apparent UFO may be a displaced echo of that source rather than an object beyond the camera. The object’s colour can also be misleading: green dots or ovals may look artificial, but green is a common flare colour in smartphone images.[Apple Support Community]discussions.apple.comSupport Communityi Phone Camera Lens Flare and ReflectionsSupport Communityi Phone Camera Lens Flare and Reflections

Recent image-processing research treats smartphone reflective flare as a real and difficult technical problem. A 2023 paper on nighttime smartphone flare removal describes reflective flare as light reflecting inside lenses, producing bright spots or ghosting in photos, and notes that flare patterns can be diverse enough that automatic removal is challenging. Another flare-removal paper describes lens flare as appearing in halos, streaks, colour bleeding and haze when a camera is pointed at a strong light source.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.

For UFO investigation, the practical issue is context. A single cropped or compressed image is usually weak evidence. A stronger Berlin photo case would need the original file, exact time, exact position, direction of view, nearby light sources, other frames before and after the image, and any live observation. Without those, a small object can become more mysterious simply because the information needed to explain it has been stripped away.

A useful rule is that a photo-first UFO becomes more interesting only when it resists the obvious checks. Does the “object” move consistently across a sequence rather than mirroring a bright source? Is it visible to more than one camera from a different angle? Was it seen live by independent witnesses? Does the original file preserve metadata? Does the object behave like something at distance rather than like a reflection locked to the camera’s geometry? Many Berlin cases do not reach that threshold.

What these cases show about Berlin’s UFO record

The photo cases weaken the idea that Berlin’s modern UFO history is built around hidden landmark incidents. They strengthen a different, more useful interpretation: Berlin is a laboratory for ordinary misidentification under urban conditions. Its UFO record is full of cameras, landmarks, lights and later discoveries rather than a small number of robust, unexplained encounters.

That does not mean every photograph should be dismissed immediately. Some ordinary explanations require work: a plane caught during a long exposure can look like a string of coloured lights; a balloon can look metallic and controlled; a bird can become a dark disc if blurred; a drone can be hard to identify if the time, height and direction are missing. But Berlin’s repeated “noticed later” cases show that the first hypothesis should often be photographic, not extraterrestrial.

The December 2015 Friedrichsfelde case is a good reminder that not all photo-first cases are lens reflections. The witness was photographing the Geminid meteor shower in an automatic series and later noticed a partly coloured light constellation in two images. GEP’s favoured explanation was aircraft. This matters because the sceptical answer is not a single catch-all; investigators still have to choose between lens reflection, aircraft, satellites, meteors, balloons, birds, drones and insufficient data.[Ufokarte.de]ufokarte.deberlin 20151214 bberlin 20151214 b

The broader German reporting environment is also moving towards more systematic data collection. IFEX at the University of Würzburg says reliable UAP research depends on systematic reporting and analysis, and its pilot-focused reporting platform is designed to gather more structured information from trained observers. The Luftfahrt-Bundesamt cooperation announced in 2025 is aimed at aviation-relevant reports, not casual phone photos, but it underlines the same principle: better data matters more than dramatic labels.[University of Würzburg]uni-wuerzburg.deOpen source on uni-wuerzburg.de.

How to read a Berlin UFO photo responsibly

A balanced reading of Berlin photo cases starts with two truths at once. First, the witness may be honest and the image may be unedited. Second, an honest unedited image can still contain a camera artefact. The question is not whether the image is “fake”; the question is whether the image feature corresponds to a real object in the sky.

For Berlin, the most useful warning signs are clear:<div class="content-enhancement content-enhancement--insight-grid" markdown="1">

• The object was not seen live and was noticed only after reviewing the photo.
• The image includes the Sun, Moon, street lamps, lit buildings, vehicle lights, the television tower or other strong light sources.
• The object is green, orange, oval, ring-shaped, triangular, disc-like or repeated across the image in a way that resembles ghosting.
• The photo was taken through glass, from a moving vehicle, at night, into strong backlight, or with long exposure.
• The original file, exact location, viewing direction or neighbouring frames are missing.</div>

The most useful strengthening signs are the opposite: multiple original frames, a clear time and place, consistent movement independent of the camera, several witnesses who saw the object live, a second camera angle, and enough surrounding data to check aircraft, satellites, weather, reflections and local lighting.

Berlin’s accidental UFO photos are therefore not a trivial footnote. They are one of the best ways to understand the city’s UFO pattern as it actually appears in the record: not as a chain of proven unknown craft, but as a modern urban reporting stream shaped by phones, bright landmarks, image artefacts, social media, and the gap between what the eye saw and what the camera later seemed to reveal.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to When Berlin UFOs Appear in Photos. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Discusses evaluating photographic evidence.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Highlights cases with stronger supporting evidence.

See on Amazon

Book

The Digital Photography Book

By Scott Kelby

Helps explain image artefacts often mistaken for UFOs.

See on Amazon

Book

Understanding Exposure

By Bryan F. Peterson

Rating: 4.5/5 from 19 Google Books ratings

Explains optical effects and camera behavior relevant to UFO photos.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The UFO ExperienceUFOsThe Digital Photography Book

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSAUSAUSAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Example eBay listing

Halo of the Sun - Silent Hill Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

SearcheBay.co.uk: sun halo poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Sunrise Solitude Minimalist African Woman in Golden Sun Halo Canvas Poster Art

SearcheBay.co.uk: sun halo poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Black and Tan Cat Art Nouveau Style Sun Halo Poster 18x24in

SearcheBay.co.uk: sun halo poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Sunrise Solitude Minimalist African Woman in Golden Sun Halo Art Poster Print

SearcheBay.co.uk: sun halo poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: ufokarte.de
Title: UF O-Sichtungen in Berlin (Berlin) — Ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/ort/berlin

2. Source: ufokarte.de
Title: UF O-Sichtungen in Berlin — Ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/bundesland/berlin

3. Source: ufokarte.de
Title: berlin 20240616 b
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20240616-b

4. Source: ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20220909-a

5. Source: ufokarte.de
Title: berlin 20211112 b
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20211112-b

6. Source: ufokarte.de
Title: berlin 20210619 e
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20210619-e

7. Source: ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20190118-a

8. Source: ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20180326-a

9. Source: ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20171115-a

10. Source: ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20151224-a

11. Source: ufokarte.de
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20140312-a

12. Source: discussions.apple.com
Title: Support Communityi Phone Camera Lens Flare and Reflections
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-250004327

13. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/guide/motion/lens-flare-generator-motn16406dc6/mac

14. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15046

15. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv How to Train Neural Networks for Flare Removal
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12485

16. Source: ufokarte.de
Title: berlin 20151214 b
Link:https://ufokarte.de/fall/berlin-20151214-b

17. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/252020527

18. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/en-lb/guide/motion/motnd208733f/mac

19. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/253512182

20. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/ru-ru/guide/motion/motn2597f4ec/mac

21. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255516615

22. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/nl-nl/guide/motion/motncf462e50/mac

23. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/256183546

24. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/en-kg/guide/motion/motn624d7abf/mac

25. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255573625

26. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/en-ph/guide/motion/motn17c66f82/mac

27. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/254409707

28. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/en-il/guide/motion/motn125277a3/mac

29. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/en-az/guide/motion/motn169f7d0f/mac

30. Source: discussions.apple.com
Link:https://discussions.apple.com/thread/256253289

31. Source: support.apple.com
Link:https://support.apple.com/guide/motion/3d-text-finish-controls-motnfefe3aca/mac

32. Source: communities.apple.com
Link:https://communities.apple.com/de/thread/253204252

33. Source: focus.de
Link:https://www.focus.de/wissen/uni-wuerzburg-und-luftfahrt-bundesamt-kooperieren-bei-ufo-meldestelle-fuer-piloten_c5229adc-5058-4813-8b65-a664da5b9b6b.html

34. Source: focus.de
Link:https://www.focus.de/panorama/mysterioeses-himmelsphaenomen-sorgt-fuer-unruhe-laser-erzeugte-kunststern-in-90-kilometern-hoehe-ueber-potsdam_a680bf75-e570-4644-b732-ecfdde5d759e.html

35. Source: uni-wuerzburg.de
Link:https://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/ifex/aktuelles/single/seite-1/?cHash=55f7fa062e321bcd6b6cd76554a45c06&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=231720

36. Source: uni-wuerzburg.de
Title: University of Würzburg UAP-Meldestelle für Piloten
Link:https://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/ifex/forschung-projekte/uap-meldestelle-fuer-piloten/

37. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Lens flare
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_flare

Additional References

38. Source: youtube.com
Title: What’s the size of the Costa Rica UFO??
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu03kUBCLS0

39. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC_juqOM6pQ

40. Source: youtube.com
Title: CCTV footage which shows bright’UFO’ in Australian sky goes viral
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sghwZHuqXA

41. Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Videos Explained: Mick West’s Expert Analysis
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4QF__92q0

42. Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/COJPEsMI4uP/

43. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/719021735417408/posts/1138709060115338/

44. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/iPhoneography/comments/1nmqwng/can_someone_please_tell_me_whats_that_green_dot/

45. Source: bettercacher.org
Link:https://bettercacher.org/no/geocache/GC4B4YR

46. Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DZPz5VvjmrQ/

47. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/RadioBremerhaven/photos/der-gr%C3%BCne-punkt-auf-fotos-und-videos-eine-einfache-erkl%C3%A4rungauf-fotos-oder-video/1300623282054275/